Song of Songs: Black and/but Beautiful

After the last class, Sam wrote, saying: I have a feeling that skin color must have “meant” something in Biblical times; there may be no way to figure out what it was. In the Song of Songs, while the female narrator calls herself “black and beautiful,” in the very next sentence, says “Don’t look at me as black,” and then goes on to say that she’s just tanned from sitting out in the vineyards. What’s that about?”
—————————————————————————————————–
Here is some research into that question.  No answer is being given, just material for thought.  Maybe too much material.  
There verses to which Sam is referring are in Chapter 1: 5-6.  Here is the JPS Tanakh translation
5 I am dark, but comely,
O daughters of Jerusalem –
Like the tents of Kedar,
Like the pavilions of Kedar,
Like the pavilions of Solomon
6 Don’t stare at me because I am swarthy,
Because the sun has gazed upon me.

Here is the Hebrew English, JPS 1917 translation (http://www.mechon-mamre.org/ )
  שְׁחוֹרָה אֲנִי וְנָאוָה,
 בְּנוֹת יְרוּשָׁלִָם;
כְּאָהֳלֵי קֵדָר,
כִּירִיעוֹת שְׁלֹמֹה.
5 ‘I am black, but comely,
O ye daughters of Jerusalem,
as the tents of Kedar,
as the curtains of Solomon.
  אַל-תִּרְאוּנִי
שֶׁאֲנִי שְׁחַרְחֹרֶת;
    שֶׁשְּׁזָפַתְנִי הַשָּׁמֶשׁ 
6 Look not upon me,
that I am swarthy,
that the sun hath tanned me.
The classic book on Song of Songs is the Anchor Bible series volume 7C by Marvin H. Pope, 1977, which is both translation and commentary.  Here is Pope’s translation (he uses the labels a, b, etc for ease of commentary)
5
a Black am I and beautiful
b O Jerusalem Girls
c Like the tents of Qedar
d Like the pavillions of Salmah
6
a Stare not at me that I am swart
b That the sun has blackened me.
Here is a translation by Chana and Ariel Block (1995).  They aim for a reasonably literal but more literary and poetic translation.
5 I am dark, daughters of Jerusalem,
and I am beautiful!
Dark as the tents of Kedar, lavish
as Solomon’s tapestries.
6 Do not see me only as dark:
the sun has stared at me
Here is a translation by Marcia Falk.  She creates a poetic translation that captures her interpretation and is often quite far from literal.   Because of it’s non-literalness, it’s hard for her translation to add to the current discussion, but it’s interesting.
Yes, I am black! and radiant –
O city women watching me –
As black as Kedar’s goathair tents
Or Solomon’s fine tapestries
Will you disrobe me with your stares?
The eyes of many morning suns
Have pierced my skin, and now I shine
Black as the light before the dawn.
—————————————————————————
Verse 5a:  Black and beautiful, vs black but beautiful
The conjunctive ve- most commonly means “and”.  It is less frequently used to connote the adversative meaning = “but” (Bloch).   
The Blochs suggest that the language is ambiguous and that the maiden could be either apologizing for her blackness or boasting of it. 
Both JPS translations take the adversative meaning “but.” 
Pope, Blochs and Falk chose “and.” 
The JPS may be heavily influenced by rabbinic interpretation.  Regarding this verse, the Soncino Song of Songs Rabbah [redacted circa 550 CE] translates “ black but comely” and the interpretation is adversative, saying “I am black through my own deeds, but comely through the works of my ancestors,” and “The Community of Israel said: I am black in my own sight, but comely before my Creator.”   Also, “R. Levi b. Haytha applied this verse in three ways.  ‘I am black all the days of the week and comely on the Sabbath;  I am black all the days of the year and comely on the Day of Atonement; (I am black through the Ten Tribes and comely through the tribes of Judah and Benjamin;) I am black in this world and comely in the world to come.’
Rashi (11th century) follows this interpretation and furthermore expounds the rest of verse 5 saying “If I am black as the tents of Kedar, which are blackened by the rain, for they are constantly spread out in the deserts, I am easily cleansed to be like the curtains of Solomon.”   In other words, the maiden may be black, but she can be cleansed.  In Rashi’s view, black AND beautiful do not go together.
Pope points out that black shows up as a positive color in several biblical verses:
healthy black hair as opposed to yellowish diseased hair (Lev 13:31,37) – when the black hair grows back in, it is a sign of health; 
the locks of the lover are “black as a raven” (SoS 5:11);
Zech 6:2-6 – there are 4 chariots representing the 4 winds and each has a different color horse.  The black horse represents the north wind.  “Those that went out to the regions of the north have done my [God’s] pleasure in the region of the north.”  None of the other chariots is mentioned.
In some cases black is opposed to ruddy/white and appears to be the antithesis of health.  In Lam 4:7f, whiteness and ruddiness represent health and purity while those who have debased themselves have faces blacker than soot.  Pope interprets that this opposition only applies in a case where the healthy normal skin would be ruddy/white, but “has no meaning with respect to innate blackness which has its own beauty.”  That is, he claims the blackness is not innately “bad” but rather a sign of loss of normal color.
Verse 5c: tents of Qedar
Pope:  Qedar = tribe of Northern Arabia, connected with one of Ishmael’s sons.  Pope says that in rabbinic usage, the term is applied to Arabs collectively.  The root qdr carries the idea of darkness.
Blochs:  the tents of the nomadic Bedouins were typically made of the wool of black goats.
SoS Rabbah says: “Just as the tents of Kedar, although from the outside they look ugly, black, and ragged, yet inside contain precious stones and pearls, so the disciples of the wise, although they look repulsive and swarthy in this world, yet have within them the knowledge of the Pentateuch, the Scriptures, the Mishnah, the Midrash, Halacoth, Talmud, Toseftas and Haggadah.”
Verse 6 a: al-tiruni she’ani shecharchoret:  Translated variously as:
don’t stare at me because I am swarthy (JPS Tanakh)
look not upon me that I am swarthy (JPS 1917 – this is the most literal)
stare not at me that I am swart (Pope)
do not see me only as dark (Blochs)
Pope says that al-tiruni [don’t look] has no hint of envy or disdain – it is non committal.  Blackness, he says, is striking and beautiful but not necessarily a cause for envy.  He translates “stare,” I believe, in the sense of look intently but neutrally
Shecharchoret, translated here as swarthy, swart or dark, is a hapex legomenon [biblical word that appears only once in it’s form].  It is taken as a diminutive of black.
Blochs consider this verse to be an admonition not to see the maiden in only one aspect, that is, not only as black.
SoS Rabbah says that “the sun of idolotry may have tanned us [Israel], but you [other nations] are swarthy from your mother’s womb;  for when a woman is pregnant she goes into her idolatrous temple and bows down to the idol along with her child.”
Rashi interpets “Do not look upon me disdainfully…because I am swarthy, for my blackness and my ugliness are not from my mother’s womb, but from tanning in the sun, for that blackness can easily be whitened by staying in the shade.”   That is, according to Rashi, the maiden is not idolatrous (black) from birth, but represents Israel, which can be whitened by moving out of the sun.
Verse 6: That the sun has blackened me (shezaphatni)
Pope: shezaphatni might come from two different roots: szp = see, look at; sdp = blasting or scorching of grain by the east wind.  So it could mean, “the sun has looked upon me,” or “the sun has scorched me.”   
The Blochs translate “has stared at me.”  They point out that shazaph outside of SoS is used in Job as “look upon” or “catch sight of,” when the eye is the agent.  If sun is the agent of sight, the meaning is secondarily “tan” or “sunburn.’  In modern Hebrew szp is used only for sunburn.
Summary
We have gathered very little Biblical evidence, through interpreting SoS 1:5-6, that “black” in the Bible carries a negative connotation.  That does not mean it is not there, as our search has been limited.  The negative connotation is, however, pronounced in the Midrash and in Rashi.  Both rabbinic sources identify blackness with something bad, which can, and hopefully will, be washed away.
Pope, in his discussion on SoS 1:5-6, says that although Rashi “apparently had difficulty conceiving that our lady could be both black and beautiful…in another connection…Rashi overcomes his melainophobia and goes to some trouble to demonstrate that black is beautiful.”  Pope refers to Rashi on the Cushite women, which is where we began investigating the connotation of “black” in the Bible. It’s worthwhile looking at what Rashi says regarding Num 12:1.  Following is Pope’s translation. 
The Cushite woman.
This teaches that everyone acknowledged her beauty, just as everyone acknowledged to the blackness of the Cushite.
Cushite
Rashi proves by Gematria that black is beautiful by showing that numerically, “Cushitess” = “good-looking.”
I further found the following (http://www.tachash.org/metsudah/m03r.html#ch12 )
For, he married a Cushite woman.
What does the Torah teach? You find a woman beautiful in appearance but not beautiful in deed; in deed, but not in appearance. But this one was beautiful in everything. [explaining why the repetition, “because he married a Cushite woman.” To teach that she was beautiful in both deed and appearance.]
The Cushite woman.
Because of her beauty, she was called “Cushite,” like a man who calls his attractive son “Cushite” to ward off the power of the evil eye over him.

Notes from Zipporah and Bridegroom of Blood

It may be useful to look over the notes prior to the class on Cushite woman.   In the discussion, some suggested that since God had decreed circumcision with Abraham, Moses was not in compliance and therefore Zipporah needed to circumcise  Moses.  In this view, it was not Gershom who was circumcised.   My notes  contain an alternate view.

Keturah and Midian
Ø      Gen 25:1-2  After death of Sarah, and Rebekkah moves into Isaac’s tent – Moses takes Keturah for wife– one son is Midian.  (nomadic desert tribes) –
Ø      Gen 25:6 sons of Abraham’s concubine (pilagesh) are sent eastward.  (Perhaps Keturah’s sons.).  I Chron 1:32 states “Sons of Keturah, Abraham’s concubine (pilagesh).   Pilagesh is between wife and slave, technically independent, sustained by man, yet free to leave.  (TWC p 125)

Exodus –Jethro and Zipporah
Ø      2:15-22 – Moses flees from Pharoah after killing the Egyptians and goes to the land of Midian.  He marries Zipporah, the daughter of the priest (cohen) of Midian (outside of Egyptian jurisdiction).  First called Reuel.  Look how Moses is a savior, like with the Hebrews.  They have a son named Gershom (“ger” resident alien, no land).  What does Zipporah know from being a priest’s daughter?
·         Per Etz Hayim: early history of close friendly relations between Midianites and Israel – became enemies following conquest of Canaan (see Num 31)
Ø      3:1 – Father in law priest now called Jethro.  Moses tending flocks goes to Horeb (Sinai) and burning bush; mysterious and miraculous Presence.  YGod calls Moses to service, Moses demurs.  —YMagic rod snake;  —Yleprous hand [CUSHITE];  —Ywater turns to blood [ZIPPORAH];  —YAaron to speak [CUSHITE].
Ø      3:20 – So Moses took his wife and sons.
Ø      4:18-20 – Moses takes leave of Jether (Jethro) and Moses heads to Egypt with Zipporah and sons (note plural)
Ø      4:22-3 – Moses to say to pharoah about killing first-born (he never does)
Ø      4:24-26 – the mysterious bridegroom of blood and Zipporah’s evident priestess power.  Echoes of burning bush mysteriousness and blood.
·         Moses’ legs could be genitals.
·         Tosefta Shabbat 15:8 – women can circumcise, but not in Bavli.  See also Cohen.
·         (JSB 113)  the saving power of the bloody foreskin may foreshadow the protective role of blood on the Israelite’s door posts.
·         (Pardes) Interpretations of why God seeks to kill Moses (strictly speaking not clear if Moses or son is intended victim)
o        premonition of things to come re Pharaoh: plague against firstborns;  danger to nation as a whole during last plague
o       variation of theme of Moses refusing call – comes after God’s revelation at bush and Moses’ reluctance
·         (Pardes) Interpretations of Zipporah’s action
o       she placates the attacker and illustrates to Moses that the weak can overcome the strong – and can stick hostile oppressors;  and Moses did seem paralyzed by weakness here.
o       right after this Ex 5, Moses goes to pharoah.
o       she rescues him a bit like Miriam and Pharaoh’s daughter did
·         Note Jacob wrestling with Angel: Gen 32:23-33 for a comparable mysterious encounter with God
·         Etz Hayim: confrontation with God is so terrifying that it makes confrontation with Pharaoh minor.  hatan damim could convey “you are now circumcised and so protected for me by means of the blood of circumcision.”   Shades of protection of pascal lamb blood.

Etz = Etz Hayim
Fischer = Exodus to Deuteronomy A Feminist Companion to the Bible: “The Authority of Miriam,” Imrtraud Fischer
JSB = JPS Study Bible
Nashim = Nashim Spring 2010 Wendy Zierler “On Account of the Cushite Woman that Moses Took”
Pardes = Countertraditions in the Bible

Summer Tanach Studies July 19

Summer Tanach Studies 
Monday, July 19, 2010, 7:30 pm – 8:45 pm 
Eitz Chayim Library
NOTE NEW TIME AND PLACE
Topic is  
The Midianites: Priests?  Monotheists? 
Zipporah, the Cushite Woman, Miriam and Moses
Ex 4:24-26 “The Bridegroom of Blood”
Num 11:35-12:9 “The Cushite Woman” 
And Related Texts 
Please do not bring food as this is the beginning of the fast of Tisha B’av. 
If anyone would like to stay after class and read Eicha (Lamentations) together, we can do so
 



The formation of the Israelites

To those who were in the Canaanite class, thanks for sending me back to check on my comments about the Iron Age being responsible for cisterns and creating terraces. 

Although a huge number of cisterns were required, along with clearing the wilderness and creating the terraces in the settlement in the hills of Palestine in the time of Joshua (about 1200 BCE), the evidence that iron tools made this possible is thin.   What is certain that there was a huge amount of physical labor involved in the settlement, in creating the irrigation systems and the vineyards etc.  Carol Meyers says “The role of the Israelites as inventors of technology is a moot point.  What stands out is the presumably unprecedented and widespread use of cisterns in the pioneer period [time of Joshua circa 1200 BCE]…. The number of implements made of iron in proportion to bronze does not rise significantly in the Iron I period.  Whether iron or bronze tools, the physical effort involved was sustantial.”  Discovering Eve, pg 55.   See also the PBS Nova series “The Secrets of the Bible.” http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/bible/

Texts for Canaanites – from Curse to Conquest

Topic Text Notes














Appearance in Text







Gen 9:20-27 Curse of Canaan by Noah – Ham saw father’s nakedness = ervah ערה



implies shameful exposure – BdB 788




rainbow right before this in text




Adam & Eve nakedness = arumim – Gen 2:25, 3:7,10 – not ashamed ערמ
Who “they” are
exposed – bare




Gen 10:15-10 List of Canaan’s descendents – Jebusites, Amorites, Gergishites, etc

Ex 3:8,17, 34 List of tribes, Canaanites, Hittites, Amorites, Perizzites, Hivites, Jebusites
What is wrong with them?






Lev 18:3,6,7 Do not be like Canaanites – do not uncover ervah – implies act of rape ערה

Lev 18:24-30 do not defile yourselves like them – Canaanites as sexual degenerates.

Lev 20:22-26 do not follow their practices – you shall possess the land











What God will do







Just Land







Gen 12:5 Abram sets forth for Canaan and arrives for a stop


Gen 12:7 God assigns land to Abram’s offspring



Gen 13:12 Abram returns from Egypt andstays in land of Canaan


Gen 13:14-17 God promises Canaan to Abram




Gen 15:7 God gives Canaan as inheritance to Abram



Gen 15:16 Iniquity of Amorites





Gen 15:18-19 God covenants with Abram to give land to offspring


Gen 17:8 God establishes covenenant and gives Canaan and will be also their God

Gen 23:19 Abraham buries Sarah in Canaan



Gen 24:3-4 Isaac cannot have a Canaanite wife



Gen 28:1 Jacob cannot take wife from daughters of Canaan


Gen 31:3 YHVH tells Jacob to return to birthplace – place of ancestors (Canaan)

Gen 33:18 Jacob returns to Canaan




Gen 36:2 Esau took wives from daughters of Canaan



Ex 3:8,17 God will take them to Canaanite land – list of tribal names


Ex 6:8 God will bring them to the land




Ex 33:1-2 I will send an angel to drive out the Canaanites etc


Num 14:9 Joshua says the Canaanites are “our prey”



Num 14:45 they lose battle with Canaanites and Amalekites at Horman

Deut 11:23-25 God will dislodge – put dread and fear over land


Deut 31:3-5 God will cross over before the Israelites and wipe “them” out










Land and not worshipping foreign gods



KEY Ex 23:23-33 You shall not bow down to their gods – I will drive them out – no covenant with them and gods

Ex 34:11-16 God covenants with Moses to drive out Canaanites etc – no covenant with “them”


This is after Golden Calf and 2nd 10.  If they are driven out, 
how can they be covenanted with?

Num 33:51-55 You shall dispossess and demolish – Those you allow to remain will be thorns
see Ex 23:23-33 Bible is severe with Canannites because culture easily confused w/ Isrealites: Torah 1019

Deut 6:10-15 Land full of cities and cisterns you did not make – do not follow their gods

Deut 7:1-5 You must doom them to destruction – not intermarry – smash their pillars Rahav
see Num 33:51-53







KEY Deut 7:16-26 You shall destroy – really strong





Deut 9:1-5 God will wipe them out because of their wickedness



Deut 12: 2-3 Tear down the altars






Deut 12:29-31 God will cut down nations





Deut 20:10-15 Offer peace – kill males and take booty – this is for distant towns


Deut 20:16-18 Towns belonging to Canaanites that are heritage, no one can live. 
Rahav


Proscribe lest they lead you to do things they have done for their gods
Contradictions







Lev 25:44 You may acquire slaves from nations about you


Lev 25:45,47 You may acquire slaves from children or resident aliens
גר

Lev 26:32 God will make land desolate so enemies who settled in will be appalled

Lev 26:38 Land of your enemies shall consume you



Num 15:14-16 Same rules for you and stranger


גר

Num 15:26 Israelite community and stranger alike shall be forgiven 
גר

Num 15:29 One ritual for Israel and stranger


גר

MONDAY, June 21 – Canaanites – from Curse to Conquest

MONDAY, June 21 – Canaanites – from Curse to Conquest
TUESDAY, July 6 – topic tbd
MONDAY, July 19 – topic tbd
MONDAY, August 2 – topic tbd
7:00 pm to 8:30 pm in the Eitz Chayim Community Room
136 Magazine Street, Cambridge
Feel free to bring brown bag dinner and/or wine

Through a close and intertextual reading of selected Biblical texts, we will explore the intersection of gender and politics in the ancient Israelite love/hate relationship with the outsider/other.

Each session will be completely stand-alone. Come to any or all.

Neither prior text study nor knowledge of Hebrew is required. Penina will supply the text choices. Bringing your own tanach (Bible) will be very helpful.

Topics may include
• Moabite women (and Ruth and David) – the permeable boundary between insider and outsider
• The Cushite woman (and Miriam and Moses)
• The Adam and Eve – is Creation in the image of God androgynous? Is YHVH gendered?

Joshua June 6 2010 – Chaps 14 – 15

Sources are in bold (if any) and described at end.
————————————————
Think about Num 14:44 where people defied YYVH and went to battle and were routed with Ai.
Caleb and Joshua represent those who are willing to fight for their land.  The 10 spies who died of plague showed themselves willing to fight – but not sure about the need to do so, and not trusting in God.

CHAPTER 14
14:1————- Eleazar the priest  ELEAZAR (Heb. אֶלְעָזָר; “God/El-has-aided”), high priest after *Aaron . Eleazar was Aaron’s third son (Ex. 6:23); his older brothers Nadab and *Abihu perished after offering strange fire before the Lord (Lev. 10:1–7; Num. 3:4). During his father’s lifetime Eleazar served as the “head chieftain of the Levites” (Num. 3:32) and performed some of the functions of the high priest (ibid. 19:4). After Aaron’s death, Eleazar was appointed high priest in his father’s place (ibid. 20:28; Deut. 10:6).  “Eleazar.” Encyclopaedia Judaica. Ed. Michael Berenbaum and Fred Skolnik. 2nd ed. Vol. 6. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2007. 298. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 13 May 2010.
—————— Moses can invest Joshua, but priest has to seek instructions from Unim.  In Num 34:17: Eleazar is priest, not prophet – he carries on Aaronic tradition while Joshua carries on Mosaic.
14:6————- Caleb is a Kenizzite, but also seemingly referred to as of the tribe of Judah.  Kenizzites were related to Edomites (Gen 36:11, 15, 42..) and listed with Canaanites who preceded Israelite settlement (Gen 15:19) “It would seem that it was only with the advent of the monarchy that the Calebites were completely integrated into Judah and became one of its major family groups. (EJ)  Does this story undermine Judah (Isreal’s) supremacy, ie foreigners do what Judah could not do?  (J&M – Fewell, pg 139)
14:7-8———- Caleb speaks as if he were the only spy
14:11———– Caleb is strong for war – then and now
14:9,13-14—- Joshua gave Hebron to Caleb because he wholly followed YHVH.  Num 14:24 – God says “my servant Caleb” was loyal etc.   Deut 1:16: Same idea, reported about God by Moses.  Num 14:6 – Joshua and Caleb rend their garments because of community’s complaints
14:14———– Repeat “Kenizzite
14:15———– Land had rest from war.  See 11:23 for same statement.  [formula?]


CHAPTER 15
15:1————- Judah’s lot extends to Edom
15:13———– Joshua give’s Caleb a portion “among the children of Judah” 
15:15———– Kiriath-sepher = “City of writing” or “city of books” – to spell out that the city to be destroyed is a city of books puts conquest in a different light – though Joshua and Judges foreground trumphalism, this remnant suggests that the place to be destroyed may be center of learning where history and texts are valued.  (J&M – Fewell, pg 131-2)
15:16———– Caleb will give Achsah his daughter to whomever will smite Kiriath sepher.  Achsah subordinate to father and husband.  Achsah means bangle or Anklet. (J&M – Fewell, pg 133)
15:17———– There is no body count, no herem.  Was this a peaceful capture?
15:18———– Is dismounting a sign of submission or an emphatic gesture whereby Achsah plants herself firmly on the ground in order to confront her father? (J&M – Fewell, pg 137)
15:19———– Achsah becomes vocal, active.  Her direct speech emphasizes the importance of this encounter (J&M Bowman pg 22). 
—————— Achsah requests a blessing as is normally given to first born (daughters of Zelophehad ask for land –  Num 27:1-11 and Jos 16:3-6) (AFC-J Bowman pg 22).  Why would her father have given her only arid land?  Caleb’s motive is not shown.  From a narrative point of view, this stresses Achsah’s assertiveness  (J&M Bowman pg 24).  “Does the fact that the bargaining chip turns bargainer render the original bargain somewhat ironic?”  (J&M – Fewell, pg 134)
—————— Achsah gains her wishes through appeals to men who have authority over her – ideal woman in patriarchal society.  She demonstrates both constraints of patriarchy and the power women may have within those limitations. (AFC-J– Klein: pg 60)
—————— In Joshua this episode brings to conclusion Moses’ promise to Caleb = end of Caleb’s story, communicating the reward to the faithful.
—————— In Judges this is not an end but a beginning – introduces first Judge = Othoniel (outsider or insider undermines Us vs Them ideology that drives conquest) (J&M – Fewell, pg 140)
—————— Women shown as owners of property rare, repeated in daughters of Zelophehad (Jos 17:3-6) (J&M – Fewell, pg 140)
—————— Achsah – male vision of what is necessary for survival and prosperity is limited – the women knows that land is dry and must have water. (WBC – Fewell)
15:20-62——- Inheritance of Judah by families
15:63———– Jebusites – inhabitants of Jerusalem – their king was Adoni-Tzedek who led the charge against Gibeon (Jos 10:1) who was slaughtered (Jos 10:22-27).  They were reduced to serfdom by Solomon (I Kings 9:20, 21).  Occupied Palestine at time of Israelite invasion. Spies saw them (Num 13:29 “powerful”, Jos 11:3)

—————————————————————————
=====================
AFC-J = A Feminist Companion to the Bible, Ser 1, Judges, Athalya Brenner, ed.
EJ = Encyclopaedia Judaica, 2007
J&MJudges and Methods: Gale Yee ed.
WBC = Women’s Bible Commentary: Dana Nolan Fewell: “Joshua.”

Joshua May 16 2010

Notes on Chaps 11-13
————————————————

CHAPTER 11
11:6————- YHVH says “I will deliver them up all slain before Israel
11:12———– utterly destroyed (herem) as Moses the servant of YHVH commanded
11:14———– they took spoil – destroyed men (not herem = sh m d instead)
11:15———– as YHVH commanded Moses etc
11:20———– YHVH hardened their hearts l’chazek et libam  (Ex 4:21 I will stiffen his heart: aychazek et libo) so they could be destroyed (herem)
11:23———– as YHVH spoke to Moses – Joshua took the whole land.  And the land had rest from war.

CHAPTER 12 – list of the 31 kings

CHAPTER 13
13:13———– Geshur and Maacath dwelt in the midst of Israel unto this day
13:22———– Balaam is slain (see Jos 22:17) – he is hakosem the soothsayer (BdB = diviners) – (see Deut 18:10: divination is prohibited and associated with the abhorrent practices of the nations that will be found in the land) (see Num 24:1-2 “and the spirit of God came upon him” [Balaam] ruah elohim;   and see Num 24:14-24 when Balaam foresees the future).  But Balaam is not an Israelite, so why is he slain?